f014686
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
396.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
120321
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.59 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
396.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
120321
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
399.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.89%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
120581
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.22%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98180
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
99.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.22%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98731
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.22%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99190
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.22%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100129
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
853.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
145682
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.01 PiB
Total Deal Size
12.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
56115
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
353.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.33%
Deal Percentage
0.12% / 448 GiB
Duplication
76836
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.25 PiB
Total Deal Size
15.71%
Deal Percentage
0.12% / 1.5 TiB
Duplication
165837
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ōi, Saitama, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
599.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
130755
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.5 PiB
Total Deal Size
18.78%
Deal Percentage
0.1% / 1.5 TiB
Duplication
165682
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
599.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111458
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Sample Piece URL not found
522.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.4%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
80679
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.22%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
112693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
96.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
115966
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 4.19 TiB | 29.31 TiB | 0.35% |
| 4 | 5.72 TiB | 22.88 TiB | 0.27% |
| 3 | 124.94 TiB | 374.81 TiB | 4.58% |
| 5 | 394.28 TiB | 1.93 PiB | 24.11% |
| 6 | 160 GiB | 960 GiB | 0.01% |
| 1 | 2.43 PiB | 2.44 PiB | 30.5% |
| 2 | 1.23 PiB | 2.46 PiB | 30.76% |
| 8 | 95.66 TiB | 766.06 TiB | 9.37% |
| 4.27 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||