f014686
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
499.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
120321
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
2.19 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
499.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
120321
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
500 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
120581
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Osaka, Osaka, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
249.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.88%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
55492
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
499.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
80370
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.59 PiB
Total Deal Size
31.82%
Deal Percentage
0.09% / 1.41 TiB
Duplication
145682
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ōi, Saitama, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
299.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
130755
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
189.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.71%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111458
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Sample Piece URL not found
500 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
80679
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
499.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
87778
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
250 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.89%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
56440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.59 PiB | 1.59 PiB | 31.82% |
| 7 | 192 GiB | 1.31 TiB | 0.02% |
| 9 | 189 TiB | 1.66 PiB | 33.24% |
| 8 | 60.81 TiB | 486.5 TiB | 9.5% |
| 6 | 49.78 TiB | 298.69 TiB | 5.83% |
| 4 | 128 GiB | 512 GiB | 0% |
| 5 | 200.09 TiB | 1000.47 TiB | 19.55% |
| 2.08 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||