DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 176366

Client ID: f03493384

Report Detail
Report 176366 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.76 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 10

f01313

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

141.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

132763

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02029742

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

221.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.08%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131375

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233333

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

77.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.25%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

129059

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03300709

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

117.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.37%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 32 GiB

Duplication

29998

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03321072

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

181.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.88%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 32 GiB

Duplication

75203

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03363420

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

49.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.72%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

84198

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03408862

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

457 TiB

Total Deal Size

24.88%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

146326

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03499693

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

181.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.88%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

104515

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03510628

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

209.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.39%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

123053

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03529375

Vancouver, British Columbia, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

199.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.86%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83062

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
6
29.44 TiB
176.63 TiB
9.61%
3
22.94 TiB
68.81 TiB
3.74%
9
63.88 TiB
574.88 TiB
31.3%
2
19.88 TiB
39.75 TiB
2.16%
4
25.66 TiB
102.66 TiB
5.58%
7
47.34 TiB
331.44 TiB
18.04%
8
41.28 TiB
330.28 TiB
17.98%
5
1.38 TiB
6.88 TiB
0.37%
1
205.19 TiB
205.22 TiB
11.17%
456.97 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.