DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 177015

Client ID: f03499288

Report Detail
Report 177015 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.74 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 11

f01313

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

94 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.17%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

132763

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01730296

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

36.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.02%

Deal Percentage

0.09% / 32 GiB

Duplication

6077

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233333

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

219.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.09%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

129059

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03322378

Kunming, Yunnan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

17.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.99%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

10149

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03358608

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

219.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.09%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 64 GiB

Duplication

221502

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03408862

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

199.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.99%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 32 GiB

Duplication

146326

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03498626

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

83.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.59%

Deal Percentage

0.07% / 64 GiB

Duplication

15959

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03499693

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

519.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

28.57%

Deal Percentage

6.56% / 34.09 TiB

Duplication

104515

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03499694

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

351.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

19.34%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

104615

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03510628

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

63.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.49%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

123053

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03526300

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

12.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

15991

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
9
16.13 TiB
145.13 TiB
7.97%
1
178.25 TiB
178.28 TiB
9.8%
4
25.56 TiB
118.28 TiB
6.5%
8
26.19 TiB
209.63 TiB
11.52%
6
72.88 TiB
437.31 TiB
24.04%
7
43.28 TiB
302.97 TiB
16.65%
3
6.66 TiB
23.22 TiB
1.27%
5
32.25 TiB
161.28 TiB
8.86%
2
114.09 TiB
242.94 TiB
13.35%
515.28 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.