DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 184260

Client ID: f03612299

Report Detail
Report 184260 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.34 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
2 issues
Number of providers: 11

f03066567

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

243.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.64%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

32764

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03081952

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

242.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.58%

Deal Percentage

0.08% / 192 GiB

Duplication

164119

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03081960

Los Angeles, California, US

242.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.6%

Deal Percentage

0.13% / 320 GiB

Duplication

65956

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03373337

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

243.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.64%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

326749

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10445 ms

Time to First Byte

76.9 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03373373

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

242.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.61%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

312740

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10431 ms

Time to First Byte

44.26 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03373733

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

242.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.59%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

314580

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10431 ms

Time to First Byte

100.25 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03377773

Bắc Giang, Bac Ninh, VN

Sample Piece URL not found

240.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.5%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 64 GiB

Duplication

314642

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10433 ms

Time to First Byte

49.09 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03377778

Bắc Giang, Bac Ninh, VN

242.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.6%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

315820

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10437 ms

Time to First Byte

72.41 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03499888

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

242.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.59%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

230687

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10428 ms

Time to First Byte

51.97 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03567899

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

45.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.99%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

139352

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10431 ms

Time to First Byte

37.17 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03577777

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

60.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.65%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

137751

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10448 ms

Time to First Byte

64.62 Mbps

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
7
192 GiB
1.31 TiB
0.05%
10
94.44 TiB
944.63 TiB
41.28%
1
14.69 TiB
14.72 TiB
0.64%
2
96 GiB
192 GiB
0%
9
134.84 TiB
1.19 PiB
53.06%
8
14.13 TiB
113.03 TiB
4.94%
258.38 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.