DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 182893

Client ID: f03633176

Report Detail
Report 182893 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.29 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 18

f01021773

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

106.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.86%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

23006

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01081419

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

572.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.97%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

278533

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083499

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

1.06 PiB

Total Deal Size

18.92%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

278721

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083931

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

31.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.56%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

299693

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084149

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

566.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.86%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

278554

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084949

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

1.25 PiB

Total Deal Size

22.29%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

279111

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01106668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

370.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.46%

Deal Percentage

10.03% / 37.19 TiB

Duplication

338184

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01315096

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

382.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.66%

Deal Percentage

11.03% / 42.19 TiB

Duplication

433076

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01708981

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

125.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.19%

Deal Percentage

0.4% / 512 GiB

Duplication

65014

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02131801

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

128 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.23%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

116752

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02131855

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

128 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.23%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

127260

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02131881

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

128 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.23%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

92276

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03126600

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

31.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.56%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

15675

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03602120

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

28.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.5%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

15917

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03611998

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

449.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.82%

Deal Percentage

0.25% / 1.13 TiB

Duplication

149351

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03623218

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

16.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.29%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

8719

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03659323

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

52.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.91%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

16239

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0870558

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

256 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.46%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

321440

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
6
225.81 TiB
1.36 PiB
24.27%
2
502.53 TiB
1005.28 TiB
17.5%
7
29.94 TiB
209.56 TiB
3.65%
3
253.91 TiB
802.94 TiB
13.98%
8
11.28 TiB
90.28 TiB
1.57%
9
20.44 TiB
184.13 TiB
3.2%
1
143.97 TiB
143.97 TiB
2.5%
5
181.25 TiB
906.91 TiB
15.79%
4
251.19 TiB
1004.81 TiB
17.5%
1.58 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.