DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 182486

Client ID: f03634175

Report Detail
Report 182486 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.10 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 10

f03100006

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

122.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.03%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 32 GiB

Duplication

79438

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100007

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

129.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.49%

Deal Percentage

0.05% / 64 GiB

Duplication

79372

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03289271

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

163.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.67%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

155658

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03315260

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

249.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.31%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

224838

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03367915

Mountain View, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

169.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.1%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

150128

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10800 ms

Time to First Byte

33.19 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03368008

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

Sample Piece URL not found

35.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.31%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

91228

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03542777

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

Sample Piece URL not found

162.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.61%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

152776

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03559187

Mountain View, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

218.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.29%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

107914

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

15819 ms

Time to First Byte

7.38 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03603117

Mountain View, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

164.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.75%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

129023

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03607310

São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

Sample Piece URL not found

113.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.44%

Deal Percentage

0.08% / 96 GiB

Duplication

67475

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
3
45.88 TiB
137.63 TiB
9%
4
32 GiB
128 GiB
0%
2
3.91 TiB
7.81 TiB
0.51%
8
84.31 TiB
674.5 TiB
44.14%
1
29.94 TiB
29.94 TiB
1.95%
7
42.75 TiB
299.25 TiB
19.58%
9
4.28 TiB
38.53 TiB
2.52%
6
4.72 TiB
28.31 TiB
1.85%
5
4.69 TiB
23.44 TiB
1.53%
10
28.81 TiB
288.31 TiB
18.87%
249.31 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.