f01021773
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
47.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.69%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
23006
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.65 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
47.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.69%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
23006
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.29 PiB
Total Deal Size
19.37%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278533
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
183.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.69%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278721
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
664.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.75%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
299693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.01 PiB
Total Deal Size
15.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278554
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
714.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.48%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
279111
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
222 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
222 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
339.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.98%
Deal Percentage
32.77% / 111.19 TiB
Duplication
116752
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
339.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.98%
Deal Percentage
32.77% / 111.25 TiB
Duplication
127260
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
339.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.98%
Deal Percentage
32.77% / 111.25 TiB
Duplication
92276
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
897.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.17%
Deal Percentage
0.26% / 2.31 TiB
Duplication
149351
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
247.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.63%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
16239
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
25.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.37%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
5391
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
222 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 78 TiB | 642.53 TiB | 9.43% |
| 1 | 119.81 TiB | 119.81 TiB | 1.75% |
| 8 | 6.66 TiB | 53.25 TiB | 0.78% |
| 5 | 122.84 TiB | 614.22 TiB | 9.01% |
| 7 | 124.28 TiB | 1.01 PiB | 15.1% |
| 2 | 89.13 TiB | 178.25 TiB | 2.61% |
| 3 | 421.91 TiB | 1.24 PiB | 18.57% |
| 9 | 16.31 TiB | 146.81 TiB | 2.15% |
| 4 | 690.38 TiB | 2.7 PiB | 40.56% |
| 1.63 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||