f02003699
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
9.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
163863
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10783 ms
Time to First Byte
13.45 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
Yes
10
3.63 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
9.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
163863
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10783 ms
Time to First Byte
13.45 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
11.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.86%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
38097
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
34.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.76%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
38445
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
20.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.78%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
38452
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
21.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
38335
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
62.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.06%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
44211
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
20.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.78%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
17108
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
47.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.93%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
41803
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
59.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
44881
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
9.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.27%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
43423
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 23.59 TiB | 94.38 TiB | 31.95% |
| 1 | 7.97 TiB | 7.97 TiB | 2.69% |
| 6 | 1.63 TiB | 9.75 TiB | 3.3% |
| 3 | 31.34 TiB | 94.03 TiB | 31.84% |
| 7 | 256 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 0.59% |
| 2 | 19.97 TiB | 39.94 TiB | 13.52% |
| 5 | 9.5 TiB | 47.5 TiB | 16.08% |
| 94.25 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03545643 | 101.75 TiB | 968 |