f02808899
Singapore, Singapore, SG
66.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
233684
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10437 ms
Time to First Byte
79.05 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
Yes
10
0.65 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Singapore, Singapore, SG
66.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
233684
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10437 ms
Time to First Byte
79.05 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
104.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
24278
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
180.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.04%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
56067
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10428 ms
Time to First Byte
7.58 Mbps
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
59.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.64%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
238473
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10432 ms
Time to First Byte
6.55 Mbps
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
60.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
235266
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10436 ms
Time to First Byte
5.61 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
100.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.81%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
326749
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10445 ms
Time to First Byte
76.9 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
110.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.59%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
314580
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10431 ms
Time to First Byte
100.25 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
68.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101344
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
67.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
102692
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
67.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
105154
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10434 ms
Time to First Byte
57.66 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
109.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
127879
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10429 ms
Time to First Byte
85.4 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
102.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.97%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
139352
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10431 ms
Time to First Byte
37.17 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
69.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
137751
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10448 ms
Time to First Byte
64.62 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
116.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.08%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
134551
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10445 ms
Time to First Byte
3.9 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 14.13 TiB | 28.25 TiB | 2.19% |
| 4 | 15.34 TiB | 61.38 TiB | 4.77% |
| 3 | 12.31 TiB | 36.94 TiB | 2.87% |
| 8 | 37.47 TiB | 299.75 TiB | 23.34% |
| 7 | 71.44 TiB | 500.06 TiB | 38.94% |
| 1 | 25.38 TiB | 25.38 TiB | 1.97% |
| 5 | 20.53 TiB | 102.66 TiB | 7.99% |
| 6 | 38.28 TiB | 229.69 TiB | 17.88% |
| 234.88 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03634057 | 255.09 TiB | 2718 |