Open
Yes
10
0.33 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
18.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
120603
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
122.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.22%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
79438
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
92.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.82%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
224838
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
73.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.57%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
150128
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10800 ms
Time to First Byte
33.19 Mbps
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
74.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.65%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
152776
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
73.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
129023
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
149.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
47190
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
149.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
47334
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
6.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
62051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12912 ms
Time to First Byte
7.58 Mbps
Bandwidth
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
Sample Piece URL not found
98.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.52%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
37881
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 16.66 TiB | 83.28 TiB | 9.7% |
| 1 | 25.69 TiB | 25.69 TiB | 2.99% |
| 3 | 118.47 TiB | 355.41 TiB | 41.4% |
| 2 | 99.84 TiB | 199.69 TiB | 23.26% |
| 4 | 48.56 TiB | 194.25 TiB | 22.63% |
| 309.22 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03633013 | 475.41 TiB | 9119 |