DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 182706

Client ID: f03648677

Report Detail
Report 182706 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Yes

Client Contract Deviation

10

Average Time To First Deal

1.78 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 16

f03098965

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

694.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.84%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

139728

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

12873 ms

Time to First Byte

7.29 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099008

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

Sample Piece URL not found

427.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.06%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

120603

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099101

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

480.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.81%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

128134

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

12901 ms

Time to First Byte

7.11 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099287

São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

Sample Piece URL not found

533.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.57%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

145171

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

14985 ms

Time to First Byte

7.05 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099777

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

996.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.13%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

166094

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

12933 ms

Time to First Byte

7.3 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099888

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

610 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.65%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

181020

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13849 ms

Time to First Byte

7.03 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03100014

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

996.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.13%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

161336

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

12605 ms

Time to First Byte

7.06 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03100088

Mountain View, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

609.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.64%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

159809

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13524 ms

Time to First Byte

7.11 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03637813

Mountain View, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

198 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.81%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

73638

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10867 ms

Time to First Byte

21.92 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03637821

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

198 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.81%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

73573

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10949 ms

Time to First Byte

41.58 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03641955

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47334

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03641974

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

Sample Piece URL not found

94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47243

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649204

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

283.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.01%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141956

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

12579 ms

Time to First Byte

6.96 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03649212

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

265.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.77%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141111

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649217

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

286.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.06%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

158983

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

12956 ms

Time to First Byte

7.06 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03649227

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

286.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.06%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

155557

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
1
25.94 TiB
25.94 TiB
0.36%
4
108.78 TiB
435.13 TiB
6.16%
7
515.81 TiB
3.53 PiB
51.17%
2
169.03 TiB
338.06 TiB
4.79%
6
134.72 TiB
808.31 TiB
11.45%
8
178.16 TiB
1.39 PiB
20.2%
3
4.88 TiB
14.63 TiB
0.2%
5
79.41 TiB
397.03 TiB
5.62%
1.19 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f03545597
233.69 TiB
6658