f03289271
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
9.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
155658
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.40 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
9.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
155658
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
50 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.22%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
150128
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10800 ms
Time to First Byte
33.19 Mbps
Bandwidth
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
Sample Piece URL not found
315.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
50879
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
312.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
47190
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
270.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.05%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
47334
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
271.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.09%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
47152
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
270.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
47243
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
Sample Piece URL not found
257.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.45%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
47658
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
246.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.98%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
158983
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12956 ms
Time to First Byte
7.06 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
243.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.81%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
155557
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 10.81 TiB | 64.88 TiB | 2.88% |
| 4 | 1.16 TiB | 4.63 TiB | 0.2% |
| 5 | 3.5 TiB | 17.5 TiB | 0.77% |
| 7 | 42.56 TiB | 297.97 TiB | 13.25% |
| 3 | 20.13 TiB | 60.38 TiB | 2.68% |
| 2 | 23.25 TiB | 46.5 TiB | 2.06% |
| 8 | 218.69 TiB | 1.71 PiB | 77.82% |
| 1 | 6.69 TiB | 6.69 TiB | 0.29% |
| 326.78 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||