DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 180221

Client ID: f03649823

Report Detail
Report 180221 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

4.70 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 10

f01083499

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

96 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.57%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

278721

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084949

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

96 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.57%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

279111

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01106668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

192 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.13%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

338184

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01315096

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

192 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.13%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

433076

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02131801

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

225 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.04%

Deal Percentage

6.06% / 13.63 TiB

Duplication

116752

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02131855

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

224.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.04%

Deal Percentage

6.06% / 13.63 TiB

Duplication

127260

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02131881

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

224.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.04%

Deal Percentage

6.06% / 13.63 TiB

Duplication

92276

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03659323

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

90.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.27%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

16239

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03703682

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

61.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.54%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

5391

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0870558

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

321.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

18.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

321440

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
2
23.75 TiB
47.5 TiB
2.75%
8
3.16 TiB
25.25 TiB
1.46%
3
12.69 TiB
38.06 TiB
2.2%
5
18.88 TiB
94.38 TiB
5.47%
7
20.41 TiB
142.84 TiB
8.28%
4
55.72 TiB
263.75 TiB
15.29%
1
33.5 TiB
33.5 TiB
1.94%
6
101.84 TiB
611.06 TiB
35.42%
9
52.06 TiB
468.56 TiB
27.16%
322 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.