f03098965
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
293.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.94%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
139728
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12873 ms
Time to First Byte
7.29 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
Yes
10
0.89 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
293.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.94%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
139728
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12873 ms
Time to First Byte
7.29 Mbps
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
298.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.04%
Deal Percentage
0.23% / 704 GiB
Duplication
120603
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
Sample Piece URL not found
290.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.9%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
145171
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
14985 ms
Time to First Byte
7.05 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
495.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
166094
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12933 ms
Time to First Byte
7.3 Mbps
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
400 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
181020
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
13849 ms
Time to First Byte
7.03 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
483.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
161336
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12605 ms
Time to First Byte
7.06 Mbps
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
399.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
159809
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
13524 ms
Time to First Byte
7.11 Mbps
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
407.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
73638
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10867 ms
Time to First Byte
21.92 Mbps
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
428.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.23%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
73573
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10949 ms
Time to First Byte
41.58 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
795.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
141956
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12579 ms
Time to First Byte
6.96 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
746.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.59%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
141111
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
445.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.51%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
158983
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12956 ms
Time to First Byte
7.06 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
445.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.51%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
155557
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 46.47 TiB | 92.94 TiB | 1.56% |
| 6 | 322.22 TiB | 1.89 PiB | 32.6% |
| 8 | 386.81 TiB | 3.02 PiB | 52.17% |
| 7 | 86.03 TiB | 602.22 TiB | 10.15% |
| 5 | 256 GiB | 1.25 TiB | 0.02% |
| 1 | 5.88 TiB | 5.88 TiB | 0.09% |
| 3 | 160 GiB | 480 GiB | 0% |
| 4 | 49.94 TiB | 199.75 TiB | 3.36% |
| 897.75 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03633022 | 262.47 TiB | 5892 |