f03519199
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
30.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101344
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
Yes
10
1.37 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
30.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101344
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
27.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
102692
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
31.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.97%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
105154
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10434 ms
Time to First Byte
57.66 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
369.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.52%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
200075
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10436 ms
Time to First Byte
80.2 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
357.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.14%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
197614
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10444 ms
Time to First Byte
87.14 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
357.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.13%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
199768
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10447 ms
Time to First Byte
57.3 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
364.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.35%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
200298
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10436 ms
Time to First Byte
57.7 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
381.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.89%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
180042
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10427 ms
Time to First Byte
8.2 Mbps
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
250.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.8%
Deal Percentage
0.05% / 128 GiB
Duplication
130961
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10995 ms
Time to First Byte
36.94 Mbps
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
264.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.23%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
133389
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10443 ms
Time to First Byte
87.14 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
257.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.01%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
116140
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
11145 ms
Time to First Byte
50.49 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
256.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
8%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
130709
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10441 ms
Time to First Byte
1.44 Mbps
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
261.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
133494
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10472 ms
Time to First Byte
76.28 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 93.28 TiB | 746.41 TiB | 23.23% |
| 5 | 130.5 TiB | 652.72 TiB | 20.32% |
| 3 | 120.69 TiB | 362.13 TiB | 11.27% |
| 7 | 162.5 TiB | 1.11 PiB | 35.41% |
| 4 | 7.44 TiB | 29.75 TiB | 0.92% |
| 2 | 80.41 TiB | 160.81 TiB | 5% |
| 6 | 19.63 TiB | 117.84 TiB | 3.66% |
| 1 | 4.75 TiB | 4.75 TiB | 0.14% |
| 619.19 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||