DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 184778

Client ID: f03680110

Report Detail
Report 184778 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.07 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
2 issues
Number of providers: 8

f03644142

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

155.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.6%

Deal Percentage

0.08% / 128 GiB

Duplication

98873

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03645007

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

160.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.08%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

99290

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03645883

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

74.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.96%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

89773

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03645884

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

69.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.5%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

91708

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03645885

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

131.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.35%

Deal Percentage

0.14% / 192 GiB

Duplication

94215

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03646493

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

61.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.8%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

89551

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03663680

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

212.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

19.94%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

100998

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03663684

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

200.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

18.78%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

101139

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
1
13 TiB
13 TiB
1.22%
8
42.19 TiB
337.5 TiB
31.67%
6
20.34 TiB
122.06 TiB
11.45%
3
4.5 TiB
13.5 TiB
1.26%
7
23.06 TiB
161.44 TiB
15.15%
2
42 TiB
84 TiB
7.88%
4
14.84 TiB
59.38 TiB
5.57%
5
54.84 TiB
274.53 TiB
25.76%
214.78 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.