f03099777
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
1 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.13%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
166094
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12933 ms
Time to First Byte
7.3 Mbps
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.21 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
1 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.13%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
166094
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12933 ms
Time to First Byte
7.3 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
96 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
79438
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
146 TiB
Total Deal Size
19.08%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
79372
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.13%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
161336
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12605 ms
Time to First Byte
7.06 Mbps
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
77.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
155658
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
31.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
224838
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
96 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
150128
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10800 ms
Time to First Byte
33.19 Mbps
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
94.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
152776
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
125.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
107914
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
15819 ms
Time to First Byte
7.38 Mbps
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
95.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.48%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
129023
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 18.44 TiB | 110.63 TiB | 14.45% |
| 1 | 20 TiB | 20 TiB | 2.61% |
| 8 | 31.81 TiB | 254.5 TiB | 33.25% |
| 7 | 45.75 TiB | 320.25 TiB | 41.84% |
| 2 | 30 TiB | 60 TiB | 7.83% |
| 146 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||